{"id":11292,"date":"2022-01-13T10:34:07","date_gmt":"2022-01-13T07:34:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gokhukuk.com.tr\/?p=11292"},"modified":"2022-01-14T10:43:14","modified_gmt":"2022-01-14T07:43:14","slug":"bosanma-davasi-kayinvalide-ile-yasanan-olaylar-taraflara-kusur-olarak-yuklenemez","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gokhukuk.com.tr\/bosanma-davasi-kayinvalide-ile-yasanan-olaylar-taraflara-kusur-olarak-yuklenemez\/","title":{"rendered":"BO\u015eANMA DAVASI \/ KAYINVAL\u0130DE \u0130LE YA\u015eANAN OLAYLAR TARAFLARA KUSUR OLARAK Y\u00dcKLENEMEZ"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
T.C. Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n\n\n\n
2.Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Esas: 2021\/4332<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Karar: 2021\/5858<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Karar Tarihi: 06.07.2021<\/p>\n\n\n\n
BO\u015eANMA DAVASI – \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130N\u0130N Y\u00dcKLEMED\u0130\u011e\u0130 ERKE\u011e\u0130N ANNES\u0130NE F\u0130Z\u0130KSEL \u015e\u0130DDET UYGULADI\u011eI VAKIASININ KUSUR OLARAK Y\u00dcKLENMES\u0130N\u0130N DO\u011eRU OLMADI\u011eI – H\u00dcKM\u00dcN BOZULMASI<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u00d6ZET: \u0130lk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131na kusur belirlemesi hakk\u0131nda sadece davac\u0131 kad\u0131n taraf\u0131n istinaf isteminde bulundu\u011fu dikkate al\u0131narak aleyhe h\u00fck\u00fcm kurma yasa\u011f\u0131 do\u011frultusunda b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesince davac\u0131 kad\u0131na ilk derece mahkemesinin y\u00fcklemedi\u011fi “Erke\u011fin annesine fiziksel \u015fiddet uygulad\u0131\u011f\u0131” vak\u0131as\u0131n\u0131n kusur olarak y\u00fcklenmesi do\u011fru de\u011fildir. \u0130lk derece mahkemesinin taraflara bir kusur y\u00fcklemeden taraflar\u0131 e\u015fit kusurlu kabul ederek davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verdi\u011fi, erke\u011fin kusur y\u00f6n\u00fcnden istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131 da temyiz etmeyerek b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesince y\u00fcklenen kusurunun kesinle\u015fti\u011fi gibi bu kusurun yan\u0131nda davac\u0131 kad\u0131na hakaret etti\u011fi ve \u015fans oyunlar\u0131 oynamak i\u00e7in bilgisayarda fazla vakit ge\u00e7irerek birlik g\u00f6revlerini ihmal etti\u011fi bu haliyle erke\u011fin tam kusurlu, kad\u0131n\u0131n ise kusursuz oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. B\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesince yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme sonucu taraflar\u0131n e\u015fit kusurlu oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fc do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f ve bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
(6100 S. K. m. 166) (4721 S. K. m. 4, 174)<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi hukuk dairesince verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm davac\u0131 kad\u0131n taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle, evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
1-Dava, kad\u0131n taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131lan T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu’nun 166\/1 maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen evlilik birli\u011finin temelinden sars\u0131lmas\u0131 nedenine dayal\u0131 bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 ve ziynet alaca\u011f\u0131 davas\u0131d\u0131r. \u0130lk derece mahkemesince yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda “Bildirilen t\u00fcm olaylar taraflardan herhangi birine kusur y\u00fcklemeye yetecek olaylar olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanaati ile” bo\u015fanmaya sebebiyet veren olaylarda taraflar\u0131n e\u015fit kusurlu oldu\u011fu belirtilerek taraflar\u0131n bo\u015fanmalar\u0131na, kad\u0131n\u0131n tazminat taleplerinin reddine, kad\u0131n lehine yoksulluk nafakas\u0131na ve kad\u0131n\u0131n ziynet alaca\u011f\u0131 davas\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015f, karar davac\u0131 kad\u0131n taraf\u0131ndan kusur belirlemesi, nafaka ve tazminatlar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden, daval\u0131 erkek taraf\u0131ndan yoksulluk nafakas\u0131 ve ziynet alaca\u011f\u0131 davas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden istinaf edilmi\u015ftir. B\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesince dosya \u00fczerinden yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda ilk derece mahkemesinin kusur belirlemesinin do\u011fru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 “Kad\u0131n\u0131n taraflar\u0131n ayr\u0131lmalar\u0131na sebep olan ve erke\u011fin evde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 esnada ya\u015fanan olayda, kay\u0131n validesinin koluna \u00e7imdik att\u0131\u011f\u0131, erke\u011fin ise kendi annesinin kad\u0131n\u0131n bo\u011faz\u0131ndan tutarak darp etti\u011fi ve evden kovdu\u011funu \u00f6\u011frenmesine ra\u011fmen sessiz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131” b\u00f6ylece taraflar\u0131n e\u015fit kusurlu oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n kusur durumuna ili\u015fkin istinaf itiraz\u0131n\u0131n, gerek\u00e7e de\u011fi\u015ftirilmek suretiyle kabul\u00fcne karar vermi\u015f ve di\u011fer itirazlar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden talepleri esastan reddetmi\u015ftir. Karar davac\u0131 kad\u0131n taraf\u0131ndan kusur belirlemesi ve tazminatlar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u0130lk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131na kusur belirlemesi hakk\u0131nda sadece davac\u0131 kad\u0131n taraf\u0131n istinaf isteminde bulundu\u011fu dikkate al\u0131narak aleyhe h\u00fck\u00fcm kurma yasa\u011f\u0131 do\u011frultusunda b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesince davac\u0131 kad\u0131na ilk derece mahkemesinin y\u00fcklemedi\u011fi “Erke\u011fin annesine fiziksel \u015fiddet uygulad\u0131\u011f\u0131” vak\u0131as\u0131n\u0131n kusur olarak y\u00fcklenmesi do\u011fru de\u011fildir. \u0130lk derece mahkemesinin taraflara bir kusur y\u00fcklemeden taraflar\u0131 e\u015fit kusurlu kabul ederek davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verdi\u011fi, erke\u011fin kusur y\u00f6n\u00fcnden istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131 da temyiz etmeyerek b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesince y\u00fcklenen kusurunun kesinle\u015fti\u011fi gibi bu kusurun yan\u0131nda davac\u0131 kad\u0131na hakaret etti\u011fi ve \u015fans oyunlar\u0131 oynamak i\u00e7in bilgisayarda fazla vakit ge\u00e7irerek birlik g\u00f6revlerini ihmal etti\u011fi bu haliyle erke\u011fin tam kusurlu, kad\u0131n\u0131n ise kusursuz oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. B\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesince yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme sonucu taraflar\u0131n e\u015fit kusurlu oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fc do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f ve bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
2-Yukar\u0131da 1. bentte a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere; tazminat isteyen davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n a\u011f\u0131r ya da e\u015fit kusurlu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu olaylar\u0131n onun ki\u015filik haklar\u0131na sald\u0131r\u0131 te\u015fkil etti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bo\u015fanma sonucu bu e\u015f, en az\u0131ndan di\u011ferinin maddi deste\u011fini yitirmi\u015ftir. O halde, taraflar\u0131n sosyal ve ekonomik durumlar\u0131, tazminata esas olan fiilin a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile hakkaniyet kurallar\u0131 (TMK m. 4) dikkate al\u0131narak kad\u0131n yarar\u0131na maddi ve manevi tazminata (TMK m.174\/1-2) karar vermek gerekirken, hatal\u0131 kusur belirlemesinin sonucu olarak yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
SONU\u00c7: Temyiz edilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn yukar\u0131da 1. ve 2. bentlerinde g\u00f6sterilen sebeplerle BOZULMASINA, temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine, dosyan\u0131n ilgili b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi hukuk dairesine g\u00f6nderilmesine oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi. 06.07.2021 (\u00a4\u00a4)<\/p>\n\n\n\n T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 2.Hukuk Dairesi Esas: 2021\/4332 Karar: 2021\/5858 Karar Tarihi: 06.07.2021 BO\u015eANMA DAVASI – \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130N\u0130N Y\u00dcKLEMED\u0130\u011e\u0130 ERKE\u011e\u0130N ANNES\u0130NE F\u0130Z\u0130KSEL \u015e\u0130DDET UYGULADI\u011eI VAKIASININ KUSUR OLARAK Y\u00dcKLENMES\u0130N\u0130N DO\u011eRU OLMADI\u011eI – H\u00dcKM\u00dcN BOZULMASI \u00d6ZET: \u0130lk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131na kusur belirlemesi hakk\u0131nda sadece davac\u0131 kad\u0131n taraf\u0131n istinaf isteminde bulundu\u011fu dikkate al\u0131narak aleyhe h\u00fck\u00fcm kurma yasa\u011f\u0131 do\u011frultusunda b\u00f6lge […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":11294,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"redux-templates_contained","format":"standard","meta":{"wds_primary_category":0,"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[74,67,72,73,71,76,75,69],"class_list":["post-11292","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-genel","tag-ailemahkemesi","tag-bosanma","tag-bosanmaavukati","tag-kusur","tag-malatyaavukat","tag-malatyabarosu","tag-velayet","tag-ziynet"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gokhukuk.com.tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11292","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gokhukuk.com.tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gokhukuk.com.tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gokhukuk.com.tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gokhukuk.com.tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11292"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/gokhukuk.com.tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11292\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11295,"href":"https:\/\/gokhukuk.com.tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11292\/revisions\/11295"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gokhukuk.com.tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11294"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gokhukuk.com.tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11292"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gokhukuk.com.tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11292"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gokhukuk.com.tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11292"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}<\/figure><\/li><\/ul><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"